From OS vulnerabilities to ransomware assaults, Android gadgets proceed to face a wide range of safety dangers. As quickly as Google fixes one downside, one other risk comes alongside.
Information safety is of utmost significance in enterprise organizations. To defend cellular gadgets in these environments, IT should perceive the safety weaknesses of various cellular OSes. The Android ecosystem’s distinctive structure requires a distinct method than one other OS does. An efficient safety technique considers the dangers related to the gadgets it is addressing.
Cellular directors ought to constantly replace themselves on the newest Android safety threats. Armed with the newest data, they will rapidly push out safety patches and guarantee their customers and information are safe.
Understanding Android’s safety challenges
The Android OS has some key structure variations from Apple’s iOS, and these variations have an effect on safety. Whereas Apple’s ecosystem is a walled backyard, Android is open supply. The OS can run on gadgets from many various distributors, every with its personal attainable options and practices.
This framework creates each alternatives and challenges for enterprise safety. In contrast to closed ecosystems, Android’s open supply basis lets system producers customise the OS. The downside is that it results in important fragmentation throughout the Android ecosystem.
{Hardware} and software program fragmentation
Android fragmentation creates a number of safety challenges for organizations. The platform’s open supply nature has led to 1000’s of distinctive system configurations throughout lots of of producers worldwide. This range creates advanced safety administration challenges for enterprise IT groups. Model fragmentation compounds these points. Newer Android variations typically take months or years to succeed in widespread adoption. Many gadgets proceed working older software program variations that may lack present safety protections.
Producer modifications
An open supply ecosystem permits speedy innovation but additionally creates safety complexities. Google maintains the Android Open Supply Mission (AOSP) codebase, which builders use to construct upon the OS and make customizations. Nonetheless, producers can add proprietary modifications that find yourself introducing vulnerabilities or delaying safety updates.
Latest main Android safety threats
Lately, safety researchers have discovered a number of Android assault vectors. Present threats to concentrate on embody zero-day vulnerabilities, banking Trojan horses, NFC relay assaults and industrial spy ware.
Android continues to be a major goal for zero-day vulnerabilities.
Notable zero-day flaws from the previous few years embody the next:
CVE-2024-43093. A privilege escalation flaw enabling unauthorized entry to delicate Android directories.
CVE-2024-50302. A Linux kernel vulnerability that enabled Serbian authorities to unlock activist gadgets utilizing Cellebrite forensic instruments.
CVE-2024-36971. A Linux kernel vulnerability that enabled distant code execution assaults.
Banking Trojans
Trojan horses that attempt to steal monetary accounts have been notably lively towards Android. One of the vital prevalent variants is the TsarBot banking Trojan, which emerged in March 2025. The malware makes use of an overlay assault to focus on over 750 banking and cryptocurrency functions globally.
Phishing web sites unfold the malware whereas posing as professional monetary portals. TsarBot requires the consumer to allow accessibility providers on their system, then deploys superior methods — together with display screen recording, SMS interception to bypass authentication, keylogging and credential harvesting. The malware establishes WebSocket connections to command-and-control servers, enabling attackers to manage the system remotely. Hackers can then steal information and execute fraudulent transactions with out the consumer’s data.
NFC relay assaults
Android gadgets use near-field communication (NFC) for contactless cost. In April 2025, a brand new risk vector emerged with SuperCard X malware, which permits contactless cost fraud by means of NFC relay assaults.
On this assault, the hacker makes use of social engineering ways to get the sufferer to put in an app on their system. The app comprises the SuperCard X malware. As soon as the sufferer faucets their credit score or debit card towards their system’s NFC reader, the hacker receives the cardboard particulars and may use them for unauthorized transactions at ATMs and point-of-sale terminals.
Business spy ware
Business spy ware know-how has additionally been very lively in recent times. In early 2024, Google’s Risk Evaluation Group launched an in depth report outlining the rising threat. The report, titled “Shopping for Spying: Insights into Business Surveillance Distributors,” notes that the industrial spy ware trade largely focuses on concentrating on cellular gadgets.
In accordance with the report, the Risk Evaluation Group tracks roughly 40 spy ware distributors actively growing surveillance instruments for Android gadgets. It additionally discovered that these distributors have been liable for half of recognized zero-day exploits towards Google merchandise and Android gadgets.
Dangerous actors will pay these distributors for surveillance software program and exploit chains to spy on a number of gadgets. Examples embody Cy4Gate, Intellexa and NSO Group, the seller behind Pegasus spy ware.
What can IT do to maintain observe of the newest Android safety threats?
Getting forward of cellular assaults requires risk intelligence and proactive monitoring. Use the next sources to remain on prime of attainable vulnerabilities:
Google’s Android safety bulletins present month-to-month updates on patched vulnerabilities and safety enhancements.
The Android enterprise safety hub delivers safety experiences and whitepapers, together with enterprise-specific steering and greatest practices.
Google Play Defend supplies info for builders, OEMs and customers to assist them perceive how the service secures Android gadgets.
Moreover, IT groups ought to embody risk detection of their administration practices. Conducting common safety audits and implementing instruments corresponding to MDM and cellular risk protection assist handle malicious makes an attempt in actual time.
Editor’s word:This text was initially written by Robert Sheldon in February 2020. Sean Michael Kerner wrote an up to date model in August 2025.
Sean Michael Kerner is an IT marketing consultant, know-how fanatic and tinkerer. He has pulled Token Ring, configured NetWare and been recognized to compile his personal Linux kernel. He consults with trade and media organizations on know-how points.
Robert Sheldon is a contract know-how author. He has written quite a few books, articles and coaching supplies on a variety of matters, together with huge information, generative AI, 5D reminiscence crystals, the darkish net and the eleventh dimension.
