Enterprise reporter, BBC Information
Think about if US President Donald Trump may flip a swap and switch off Europe’s web.
It might sound far-fetched, loopy even. Nevertheless it’s a state of affairs that has been critically mentioned in tech business and coverage circles in current months, as tensions with Washington have escalated, and considerations concerning the EU’s reliance on American expertise have come to the fore.
On the root of those considerations is the actual fact simply three US giants – Google, Microsoft and Amazon – present 70% of Europe’s cloud-computing infrastructure, the scaffolding on which many on-line providers rely.
And a few query whether or not an unpredictable US chief would weaponize the state of affairs if relations critically deteriorated – for instance, by ordering these corporations to show off their providers in Europe.
“Crucial knowledge would develop into inaccessible, web sites would go darkish, and important state providers like hospital IT techniques could be thrown into chaos,” says Robin Berjon, a digital governance specialist who advises EU policymakers.
He believes that considerations over a so known as US “kill swap” must be taken critically. “It is arduous to say how a lot bother we’d be in.”
Microsoft, Google and Amazon all say they provide “sovereign” cloud computing options that safeguard EU shoppers’ knowledge, and would forestall such a state of affairs ever occurring. The BBC has contacted the US Treasury division for remark.
In reality, there have all the time been considerations concerning the lack of “digital sovereignty” in Europe, the place US companies not solely dominate the cloud-computing market, but in addition {hardware}, satellite tv for pc web and now synthetic intelligence.
Even the area’s principal cell working techniques – Apple and Android – and cost networks – Mastercard and Visa – are American.
These fears grew to become pressing in Could when it emerged that Karim Khan, the highest prosecutor on the Netherlands-based Worldwide Prison Court docket (ICC), had misplaced entry to his Microsoft Outlook e mail account after being sanctioned by the White Home.
The ICC has issued arrest warrants for prime Israeli officers, together with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over their roles within the Israel-Gaza struggle – one thing Mr Trump known as “illegitimate”.
Khan has since quickly stepped apart till a sexual misconduct probe in opposition to him is concluded.
Microsoft says that “at no level” did it stop or droop its providers to the ICC, though it was in contact with the ICC “all through the method that resulted within the disconnection”.
Since then digital sovereignty has shot up the agenda in Brussels, whereas some public our bodies are already looking for alternate options to US suppliers.
However is it sensible to assume they might wean themselves off US expertise?
Digital sovereignty is loosely outlined as the power of a governing physique to regulate the info and expertise techniques inside its borders.
One drawback confronted by these pursuing it’s the lack of comparable alternate options.
Europe does have its personal suppliers, comparable to France’s OVHCloud, or Germany’s Germany’s T-Programs or Delos, in cloud computing.
However they account for a fraction of the market, and do not have the identical scale or vary of capabilities, says Dario Maisto, a senior analyst protecting digital sovereignty at international enterprise consultancy Forrester.
Equally, open-source alternate options can be found for widespread software program packages like Workplace and Home windows, however whereas proponents say they’re extra clear and accessible, none is as complete or well-known.
However whereas shifting to sovereign alternate options would not “occur in a single day”, it is a “fantasy” to assume it isn’t potential, says Mr Maisto.
He notes that the German state of Schleswig-Holstein is at present within the means of phasing out Microsoft merchandise like Workplace 365 and Home windows in favour of open-source options comparable to LibreOffice and Linux. Denmark’s Ministry for Digitalisation is piloting an identical scheme.
“We typically overvalue the function of proprietary software program in our organisations,” Mr Maisto says, stating that for key providers like phrase processing and e mail, open-source options work simply fantastic.
“The primary causes organisations do not use open supply are a ignorance and misplaced fears about cyber safety,” he provides.
“Our prediction is within the subsequent 5 to 10 years, there will likely be an accelerated shift [to these solutions] due to this wake-up name.”
Benjamin Revcolevschi, boss of OVHCloud, tells the BBC that companies like his are able to reply the sovereignty wants of private and non-private organisations in Europe.
“Solely European cloud suppliers, whose headquarters are within the EU and with European governance, are capable of supply immunity to non-European legal guidelines, to guard delicate and private knowledge,” he says.
However Microsoft, Amazon and Google say they already supply options that deal with considerations about digital sovereignty, options which retailer knowledge on severs within the shoppers’ nation or area, not within the US.
Google tells the BBC that it additionally companions with trusted native EU suppliers like T-Programs, granting them management over the encryption of consumer knowledge, and giving clients “a technical veto over their knowledge”. The German Military is one in all its shoppers.
In the meantime, Microsoft president Brad Smith has promised the agency would take authorized motion within the “exceedingly unlikely” occasion the US authorities ordered it to droop providers, and that it could embody a clause in European contracts to that impact.
“We are going to proceed to search for new methods to make sure the European Fee and our European clients have the choices and assurances they should function with confidence,” a Microsoft spokesman instructed the BBC.
Zach Meyers, from the Brussels-based Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) assume tank, says it’d make sense for Europe to develop its personal restricted sovereign cloud to guard important authorities knowledge.
However he provides that it is unrealistic to attempt to “get Individuals out of the provision chain, or to make sure that there’s Europeans within the provide chain at every level”.
He factors to Gaia X – a scheme launched in 2020 to create a European-based various to massive, centralised cloud platforms, which has confronted vital criticism and delays.
“A whole lot of these [tech] markets are winner takes all, so when you’re the primary mover it is actually arduous for anybody else to catch up.”
As a substitute, Mr Meyers thinks Europe ought to give attention to areas of expertise the place it’d achieve an edge.
“It might be the economic use of AI, as a result of Europe already has a a lot larger, stronger industrial base than the US has,” he says. “Or the following technology of chipmaking gear, as a result of one of many few areas the place Europe has foothold is in photolithography – the machines that make the actually top-end chips.”
So the place does the digital sovereignty agenda go from right here?
Some consider nothing will change until Europe brings in new laws that pressure regional organisations and governments to purchase native expertise. However in response to Mr Berjon, the EU has been dragging its ft.
“There’s positively political curiosity, however it’s a query of turning it right into a shared technique.”
Matthias Bauer, director on the European Centre for Worldwide Political Financial system, thinks the aim must be increase Europe’s expertise sector so it may possibly compete with the US and China.
In a report on EU competitiveness in 2024, Mario Draghi, former head of the European Central Financial institution, famous Europe is “severely lagging behind” in new applied sciences, and that “solely 4 of the world’s prime 50 tech corporations are European”.
“It is at present a lot tougher for a tech firm primarily based within the EU to scale throughout the bloc than it could be for a similar firm within the US,” Mr Bauer says.
“You not solely face totally different languages, however totally different contract legislation, labour market legal guidelines, tax legal guidelines, and likewise totally different sector-specific regulation.”
As for the speculation that President Trump would possibly flip a “kill swap” and switch off Europe’s web, he is extremely sceptical.
“It will be a sensible state of affairs if we have been near a struggle, however I do not see that on the horizon.”
But Mr Maisto says organisations should take the danger critically, nevertheless distant.
“Two years in the past, we did not assume we’d be speaking about these matters in these phrases in 2025. Now organisations wish to prepare for what would possibly occur.”







