On Friday, India\u2019s IT ministry issued the order directing Musk\u2019s X to take corrective motion on Grok, together with limiting the era of content material involving \u201cnudity, sexualization, sexually express, or in any other case illegal\u201d materials. The ministry additionally gave the social media platform 72 hours to submit an action-taken report detailing the steps it has taken to stop the internet hosting or dissemination of content material deemed \u201cobscene, pornographic, vulgar, indecent, sexually express, pedophilic, or in any other case prohibited below legislation.\u201d<\/p>\n

The order, reviewed by TechCrunch, warned that failure to conform may jeopardize X\u2019s \u201cprotected harbor\u201d protections \u2014 authorized immunity from legal responsibility for user-generated content material below Indian legislation.<\/p>\n

India\u2019s transfer follows considerations raised by customers who shared examples of Grok being prompted to change photos of people \u2014 primarily girls \u2014 to make them seem like carrying bikinis, prompting a formal criticism<\/a> from Indian parliamentarian Priyanka Chaturvedi. Individually, latest experiences flagged cases during which the AI chatbot generated sexualized photos involving minors<\/a>, a difficulty X acknowledged<\/a> earlier on Friday was brought on by lapses in safeguards. These photos had been later taken down.<\/p>\n

Nonetheless, photos generated utilizing Grok that made girls seem like carrying bikinis by AI alteration remained accessible on X on the time of publication, TechCrunch discovered.<\/p>\n

The newest order comes days after the Indian IT ministry issued a broader advisory on Monday, which was additionally reviewed by TechCrunch, to social media platforms, reminding them that compliance with native legal guidelines governing obscene and sexually express content material is a prerequisite for retaining authorized immunity from legal responsibility for user-generated materials. The advisory urged corporations to strengthen inside safeguards and warned that failure to take action may invite authorized motion below India\u2019s IT and prison legal guidelines.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s reiterated that non-compliance with the above necessities shall be seen significantly and will end in strict authorized penalties in opposition to your platform, its accountable officers and the customers on the platform who violate the legislation, with none additional discover,\u201d the order warned.<\/p>\n

Techcrunch occasion<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSan Francisco<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t|<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tOctober 13-15, 2026<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The Indian authorities stated non-compliance may result in motion in opposition to X below India\u2019s IT legislation and prison statutes.<\/p>\n

India, one of many world\u2019s greatest digital markets, has emerged as a crucial check case for a way far governments are keen to go in holding platforms accountable for AI-generated content material. Any tightening of enforcement within the nation may have ripple results for world expertise corporations working throughout a number of jurisdictions.<\/p>\n

The order comes as Musk\u2019s X continues to problem points of India\u2019s content material regulation guidelines in courtroom<\/a>, arguing that federal authorities takedown powers danger overreach, even because the platform has complied with a majority of blocking directives. On the identical time, Grok has been more and more utilized by X customers for real-time fact-checking<\/a> and commentary on information occasions, making its outputs extra seen \u2014 and extra politically delicate \u2014 than these of standalone AI instruments.<\/p>\n

X and xAI didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon the Indian authorities\u2019s order.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"